These new BBCOR, which stands for at-Ball Coefficient Of Restitution, bats have made an obvious impact on college baseball.
Balls that normally would be homers that just got over the fence are turning into routine fly outs. Sharp singles past diving infielders turn into groundouts. High-scoring affairs have turned into near pitching duels.
Baseball purists would say they love the newly changed bats – the major change being limiting a metal bat’s sweet spot – but those who have grown to love college baseball and the ping sound echo throughout Rosenblatt Stadium have to be hating the wood-like thuds after every batted ball.
The NCAA made the rule change that college baseball programs have to use these dead BBCOR bats in order to keep its players safe from line drives leaving bats in excess to sometimes more than 100 mph.
I’m all for safety when it has a legitimate and realistic reasoning behind it, but here are three things I’ve learned about the new era of college baseball (other than games haven’t been taking as long as in previous seasons):
1. Baseball followers, reporters and scouts are getting a better sense of how talented or untalented a player really is: My only criticism of the old bats were that they didn’t give a true gage on how good or bad a player was. Some batters were made better by the extended sweet spot, and pitchers sometimes weren’t given as much credit as they probably deserved. Yes, the really good pitchers overcame the live bats, but pitching against these bats give pro scouts a better idea of whether some college pitchers are good enough to be drafted in the early rounds or not. And the same thing could be said about hitters. Did some hitters have a better batting average because of the bigger sweet spot? The BBCOR bats tell a more accurate story on which batters could succeed in the near future when they transfer to the lumber even though they have taken a lot of the pop and scoring out of the collegiate game.
2. Power-hitting teams will be affected the most: This statement may be an obvious one, but it’s a true one. The number of high-scoring games are down, and, like the 2010 MLB season, this year in college baseball is looking to turn into the Year of the Pitcher. Twelve pitchers with at least 31 innings pitched have a sub-one ERA, including OU senior Michael Rocha (0.97), and only seven batters have reached the double-digit home runs mark. Teams who relied on the long ball last season have most likely have spells where they not only struggle hit homers but score runs in general. The great thing about college baseball is that most teams and coaches stress the importance of small ball – OU power hitter and 2010 team triple-crown winner junior Garrett Buechele was even called upon to attempt a bunt against Oklahoma State on Tuesday – and manufacturing runs. Teams who knew how to do that before the bat change will and have been fine, but teams who didn’t had to learn quickly how to if they want a shot of reaching Omaha.
3. How much more fun college baseball was before the Age of the BBCOR: One of the things that I have grown to love in covering the OU baseball team is the sound of a ping as a ball gets launched out of the park. The sound just causes excitement. What’s so exciting and what’s to like about a thud off a piece of metal? Nothing. The offense is out almost out of college baseball now. Obviously there are still going to be games where one team scores in the 20s or where both teams score in the double digits, but those types of games won’t be as frequent. Now this isn’t an argument against pitching in college baseball, well pitched games are always fun to watch, but people come to college games for the offense.
That’s my two cents. What’s yours?